Assessment

Michigan Test Data: Four Months Late and Counting

By John Gehring — September 24, 2003 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Schools across Michigan are still waiting for the final state test scores to be delivered several months after they were expected because of technical problems with a new state database.

Results from the Michigan Educational Assessment tests, taken by some 600,000 students in 4th, 5th, 7th, and 8th grades last winter, were expected in late May. The test results are meant to provide an important source of information that helps schools improve instruction and target problem areas for the upcoming school year.

The delay also has put thousands of Michigan students in limbo about whether they will be eligible for state scholarships to use at in- and out-of-state universities. That aid is based in part on how students performed on the MEAP test.

A bill in the legislature that would extend a Sept. 15 application deadline for the $2,500 Michigan Merit Award to Nov. 15 last week passed the Senate and is expected to be passed by the House.

The long wait has put administrators like Bill Weber, the superintendent of the 3,500-student South Redford school district near Dearborn, Mich., in a frustrating position.

While he has preliminary data from the test, Mr. Weber can’t begin analyzing the results to improve student weak spots without the final numbers.

“We haven’t received the information where we can do an item analysis, and the kind of strategic planning with respect to instructional changes,” Mr. Weber said. An item analysis is a means of breaking a test down to see how students did on individual test questions.

“We are a district that really uses this stuff, and we spend a lot of time working with the data,” Mr. Weber continued. “The scary part is, we are just four months away from our kids’ taking the next test and it will take our staff three to four weeks to really do a thorough job on the item analysis. We plan on working weekends.”

Terry Stanton, the public-information officer for the Michigan Department of Treasury, the state agency that since 1999 has overseen the MEAP system, said the delays have been caused by glitches with a database used for the first time by the agency this year.

“There have been some difficulties getting the database up and running,” Mr. Stanton said. “It’s not atypical for a first-time program. We had some 600,000 students who took a million-and-a-half tests.

“It’s a daunting project,” he said, “and given it is the first year, perhaps we were a bit optimistic we could get the results out by May.”

He acknowledged that the situation is far from ideal. “Some districts are frustrated by the fact that the scores are late, and we are frustrated by that,” Mr. Stanton said. “We understand the importance of getting the scores to the schools, but first and foremost is getting the correct scores to the schools.”

‘Unanswered Questions’

Last September, the state hired Enterprises Computing Services Inc., based in Woodstock, Ga., to set up the new database, which is expected to allow Michigan to track student test scores more closely.

A spokesman for the company said that Enterprise Computing officials were working on a combination of technical problems that have contributed to the delay. He added, however, that missing answer sheets from tests that schools sent to another vendor, the Durham, N.C.-based Measurement Inc., have also caused the delays.

A public-information officer for the Michigan Department of Education declined to comment on the delay in releasing the test scores, and instead directed questions to the state treasury department.

Sen. Wayne Kuipers, the Republican who chairs the education committee of his chamber of the legislature, has held several hearings on the delays. He said that he has heard mostly from parents and students who want to know if they are eligible for scholarships.

Some delays were inevitable with a new system, Mr. Kuipers said, but he wants the state and vendors involved to learn from their mistakes.

“Clearly, we need to make sure this doesn’t happen again,” he said. “We left people with a lot of unanswered questions, and that was unacceptable.”

Related Tags:

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Your Questions on the Science of Reading, Answered
Dive into the Science of Reading with K-12 leaders. Discover strategies, policy insights, and more in our webinar.
Content provided by Otus
Mathematics Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Breaking the Cycle: How Districts are Turning around Dismal Math Scores
Math myth: Students just aren't good at it? Join us & learn how districts are boosting math scores.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
How To Tackle The Biggest Hurdles To Effective Tutoring
Learn how districts overcome the three biggest challenges to implementing high-impact tutoring with fidelity: time, talent, and funding.
Content provided by Saga Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment The 5 Burning Questions for Districts on Grading Reforms
As districts rethink grading policies, they consider the purpose of grades and how to make them more reliable measures of learning.
5 min read
Grading reform lead art
Illustration by Laura Baker/Education Week with E+ and iStock/Getty
Assessment As They Revamp Grading, Districts Try to Improve Consistency, Prevent Inflation
Districts have embraced bold changes to make grading systems more consistent, but some say they've inflated grades and sent mixed signals.
10 min read
Close crop of a teacher's hands grading a stack of papers with a red marker.
E+
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Sponsor
Fewer, Better Assessments: Rethinking Assessments and Reducing Data Fatigue
Imagine a classroom where data isn't just a report card, but a map leading students to their full potential. That's the kind of learning experience we envision at ANet, alongside educators
Content provided by Achievement Network
Superintendent Dr. Kelly Aramaki - Watch how ANet helps educators
Photo provided by Achievement Network
Assessment Opinion What's the Best Way to Grade Students? Teachers Weigh In
There are many ways to make grading a better, more productive experience for students. Here are a few.
14 min read
Images shows colorful speech bubbles that say "Q," "&," and "A."
iStock/Getty