NAEP Weighed as Measure Of Accountability

By David J. Hoff
Washington

The federal testing program has been a tool akin to a ruler for 30 years, measuring students’ knowledge of basic subjects.

Now, President Clinton and two leading presidential contenders want to turn it into a lever, giving states financial incentives to improve performance and close the gap between high and low achievers.

While the proposals have bipartisan support, some longtime supporters of the National Assessment of Educational Progress question whether the federal government should tie a carrot to what traditionally...

This article is available to subscribers only.

To keep reading this article and more, subscribe now or purchase this article.

Already have an account? Please login.

Subscribe to Education Week and Save

Get a full year and save up to 45%!

Premium Online + Print

37 issues + Online Access
$89

You Save 45%

SUBSCRIBE NOW

(See details.)

Premium Online

12 Months Online Access
$74

You Save 38%

SUBSCRIBE NOW

(See details.)

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsored Whitepapers

• E-Policy Essentials for Schools, Write a Definitive Acceptable Use Policy

• Math Intervention - From Best Practice to Next Practice

• Motivation & Personalization: Middle School Math

• Teaching Self-Regulation Skills to Close the Income-Based Achievement Gap

• Can response systems improve learning outcomes?

• Unique Challenges Facing K-12 IT Professionals

• 10 Steps for Migrating Curriculum to Common Core

• The Educational Promise of Social Media

• Broad Knowledge Drives Literacy

• Using Collaboration to Impact Teaching & Learning

• Data Systems That Help Schools Make a Difference

• Great Books Programs Fit the CCSS

MORE EDUCATION JOBS >>
Post a Job >>