Education Funding

N.H. Funding Debate Comes Down to the Wire

By Mary Ann Zehr — March 17, 1999 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

With a court-imposed deadline bearing down on them, New Hampshire legislators last week were still squabbling over the best way to fix the state’s school finance system.

The New Hampshire Supreme Court ruled in December 1997 that the current system of paying for education with local property taxes was inequitable--and unconstitutional--and ordered the legislature to fix the problem by April 1 of this year. (“N.H. Lawmakers Still Seeking School Finance Solution,” Nov. 25, 1998.)

If the legislature fails to meet that deadline, education groups say, all schools in the state technically would be required to fire by April 15 every professional school employee. Employees would then have to reapply for their jobs after the issue was settled. And school officials could not promise job renewals without a sure source of funding for public schools, the school groups contend.

“Each [finance-reform proposal] has its major supporters and opponents, so that’s why things aren’t falling into line very quickly,” said Paul W. Krohne, the executive director of the New Hampshire School Boards Association. “There remain a lot of questions as to whether or not [the legislators] are going to make it. I join others in questioning whether the deadline can be met.”

If the legislature doesn’t meet the deadline, Mr. Krohne said, the court could give an extension, but he said that was unlikely to happen. In November, the court denied a request by the governor and the legislature to extend the deadline by two years.

Among other options if the deadline is unmet, the supreme court could impose its own tax system, the schools could close down, or the schools could continue to operate by sending their bills to the state, Mr. Krohne added.

Just last week, the state supreme court ruled against an option that had been favored by the governor to put the question of how to solve the funding issue to the people in a statewide voter referendum.

The Senate finance committee was considering two proposals last week for new broad-based taxes to pay for education. Following a public hearing March 12 and further work sessions, committee members hoped to make a recommendation on the proposals this week to the full Senate, according to Sen. Clifton C. Below, a Democrat on the finance panel.

One of the proposals, co-sponsored by Mr. Below and passed by the House March 4, calls for a combination income tax--which would be the state’s first--and property tax to pay for education.

Mr. Below said that some legislators in the past two weeks had begun to examine his proposal closely and make suggestions to improve it. He said he took that interest as a sign of minor progress.

Gov. Jeanne Shaheen

The second plan, backed by Democratic Gov. Jeanne Shaheen as an amendment to the first proposal, was sponsored by Democratic Sen. John A. King. It recommends using a combination of a property tax, legalized video gambling, a tobacco tax, and other taxes to pay for public education.

Treading Carefully

All the uncertainty about who will pay for education next year is affecting how districts are drawing up their new budgets.

On the average, districts across the state are planning on only a 4 percent increase in their budgets for next year, compared with the more typical 6 percent, said Mark Joyce, the executive director of the New Hampshire School Administrators Association.

In addition, he said, “long-term planning has been stalled.”

“People are just waiting,” agreed Philip F. Nadeau, the chairman of the Merrimack Valley school board. And he added, “it’s just wise to wait.”

The school board there has postponed proposing an $18 million bond issue to pay for a new elementary school and other needed construction work in the 2,600-student Merrimack Valley district until the state’s funding crisis is resolved, Mr. Nadeau said.

“We decided it would be prudent not to try to convince the voters to accept long-term building proposals when we couldn’t tell them how they could be funded,” he said.

Andru Volinsky, one of the lawyers for the plaintiffs in Claremont School District v. Governor, the case that brought about the supreme court’s ruling on school funding, blames Gov. Shaheen for throwing a wrench into what he views as a recent good-faith effort by legislators to fix the problem.

The House’s passage this month of the proposal recommending an income tax to help pay for education was “a huge deal” in a state that has never had an income tax, he said. He described the bill as “a foundation on which we can craft a solution.”

Mr. Volinsky branded the governor’s proposal, on the other hand, as “a slick, political package designed to avoid an income tax.”

But Brian P. Murphy, the governor’s press secretary, said Ms. Shaheen believes that not having an income tax has been key to New Hampshire’s economic success and that the funding crisis can be resolved without instituting one.

At the Brink

He said the governor believes that her tax plan would generate enough revenue to provide students with an adequate education, but that she is open to changing the proposal--short of agreeing to an income tax.

Observers say that, as time runs out, either Gov. Shaheen or legislators will have to give in on positions they have taken publicly.

Some say the governor’s proposal is flawed in that it would rely heavily on taxes from video gambling and property taxes, both of which are viewed by some legislators as unreliable funding sources for the long term. In addition, Speaker of the House Donna P. Sytek, a Republican, has said she is opposed to legalizing video gambling.

Others find the House bill equally faulty, given the governor’s consistent threats to veto any effort to establish an income tax.

And, according to Mr. Murphy, neither the House nor the Senate is likely to have the two-thirds majority needed to override a veto.

The March 11 court ruling added new urgency for a solution, as it re-emphasized the responsibility of the legislature to come to a consensus, saying that delegating the issue to the voters was unconstitutional.

Mr. Joyce of the school administrators’ association said his group was opposed to the referendum option because it would further delay a solution to the finance problem.

“We’re at the brink right now,” he said, “which could be the entrance to a new, great, equitable funding world--or a deep, dark cave that will set us back.”

A version of this article appeared in the March 17, 1999 edition of Education Week as N.H. Funding Debate Comes Down to the Wire

Events

Ed-Tech Policy Webinar Artificial Intelligence in Practice: Building a Roadmap for AI Use in Schools
AI in education: game-changer or classroom chaos? Join our webinar & learn how to navigate this evolving tech responsibly.
Education Webinar Developing and Executing Impactful Research Campaigns to Fuel Your Ed Marketing Strategy 
Develop impactful research campaigns to fuel your marketing. Join the EdWeek Research Center for a webinar with actionable take-aways for companies who sell to K-12 districts.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Privacy & Security Webinar
Navigating Cybersecurity: Securing District Documents and Data
Learn how K-12 districts are addressing the challenges of maintaining a secure tech environment, managing documents and data, automating critical processes, and doing it all with limited resources.
Content provided by Softdocs

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Funding Biden's Budget Proposes Smaller Bump to Education Spending
The president requested increases to Title I and IDEA, and funding to expand preschool access in his 2025 budget proposal.
7 min read
President Joe Biden delivers remarks on lowering prices for American families during an event at the YMCA Allard Center on March 11, 2024, in Goffstown, N.H.
President Joe Biden delivers remarks on lowering prices for American families during an event at the YMCA Allard Center on March 11, 2024, in Goffstown, N.H. Biden's administration released its 2025 budget proposal, which includes a modest spending increase for the Education Department.
Evan Vucci/AP
Education Funding States Are Pulling Back on K-12 Spending. How Hard Will Schools Get Hit?
Some states are trimming education investments as financial forecasts suggest boom times may be over.
6 min read
Collage illustration of California state house and U.S. currency background.
F. Sheehan for Education Week / Getty
Education Funding Using AI to Guide School Funding: 4 Takeaways
One state is using AI to help guide school funding decisions. Will others follow?
5 min read
 Illustration of a robot hand drawing a graph line leading to budget and finalcial spending.
iStock/Getty
Education Funding A State Uses AI to Determine School Funding. Is This the Future or a Cautionary Tale?
Nevada reworked its funding formula hoping to target extra aid to students most in need. What happened could hold lessons for other states.
13 min read
Illustration of robotic hand putting coins into jar.
iStock / Getty Images Plus