Published Online:

Letters to the Editor

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

As a "charter" subscriber to Education Week, I would like to commend you for an excellent publication. I consider it the most informative, comprehensive, and objective of all similar publications.

However, I would like to encourage your reporters to be even more sensitive to the private sector. The latest example is an article on page 3 of the Sept. 15 issue entitled "N.Y. Bank Donates Funds for Principals." Neither the headline nor the major portion of the article indicated that you were speaking only of public-school principals. It wasn't until the last paragraph that it became clear that 30 percent of the high-school principals of New York City were being ignored, both by Education Week and the Chase Manhattan Bank. (There are 152 high schools in New York City; 42 of them are independent high schools and 110 are public high schools.)

Brother Donnan Berry, S.C. Baton Rouge, La.


It's epidemic!

ECS's [The Education Commission of the States] Legislative Review headlined "Tax Roles."

A teacher-author in Century wrote of "taking role" in class.

Now this! [Education Week, Aug. 25, 1982: "... a turkey sandwich on a role. ..."]

But opportunities abound. My abridged dictionary provides more than 40 meanings/variations for "roll."

What will be the next roll-reversal seen in print?

Doug Swift Albuquerque, N.M.

Web Only

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented